Intel Core i5 560UM vs Celeron U3400 |
Released September, 2010
Intel Core i5 560UM
- 1.33 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 560UM
 | Supports trusted computing Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron U3400 vs the Core i5 560UM. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 560UM vs Celeron U3400
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 560UM | vs | Celeron U3400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.06 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1288 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 18W | 18W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.49 pt/W | 2.14 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 14.63W | 14.63W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 2,500 MT/s | 2,500 MT/s | |
details | Core i5 560UM | vs | Celeron U3400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
| Transistor count | 382,000,000 | 382,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 10 | 8 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.07 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.33 GHz | 1.07 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.33 GHz | 1.07 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 166 MHz | 166 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 500 MHz | 500 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
 Intel Core i5 560UM  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron U3400 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $107 | $250 | |
| Intel Celeron N2840 vs Core i5 560UM | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | ||
| Intel Celeron 877 vs Core i5 560UM | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | $250 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Core i5 560UM | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | ||
| Intel Core i5 520UM vs Celeron U3400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $134 | |
| Intel Celeron 1007U vs U3400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | $134 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs U3400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $17 | $134 | |
| Intel Atom Z3735F vs Celeron U3400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
