0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 560UM vs Celeron 877 |
Released September, 2010
Intel Core i5 560UM
- 1.33 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 560UM
![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 877 vs the Core i5 560UM. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 560UM vs Celeron 877
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 560UM
2,005
Celeron 877
1,902
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 560UM
1,027
Celeron 877
1,106
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 560UM
531.2 MB/s
Celeron 877
69,450 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 560UM
2,383
Celeron 877
1,832
GeekBench
Core i5 560UM
3,071
Celeron 877
2,521
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Core i5 560UM
1,976
Celeron 877
5.9
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 560UM | vs | Celeron 877 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
BGA 1288 | |||
BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 18W | 17W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.49 pt/W | 4.55 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 14.63W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 2,500 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Core i5 560UM | vs | Celeron 877 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 14 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.33 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.33 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 166 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 500 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 16,384 MB |
Intel Core i5 560UM ![]() | Intel Celeron 877 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
3217U vs 877 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | ||
1007U vs 877 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
L7700 vs 877 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
E7500 vs 877 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | ||
N2600 vs 877 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
C-60 vs 877 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
N2840 vs 877 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||