0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 540M vs AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
Released January, 2010
Intel Core i5 540M
- 2.53 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 540M
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W |
![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year | ![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 77.19W | 2.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | 2.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core |
Features Key features of the Core i5 540M vs Second Generation Opteron 8218
clock speed
Core i5 540M
2.53 GHz
Second Generation Opteron 8218
2.6 GHz
L2 cache
Core i5 540M
0.5 MB
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 540M | vs | Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
BGA 1288 | |||
F | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Core i5 540M | vs | Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 8 | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 77.19W |
Intel Core i5 540M ![]() | AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$117 | $250 | |
540M vs 2520M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$117 | $30 | |
540M vs 520M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$117 | $259 | |
540M vs 620M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$117 | $235 | |
540M vs 3320M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$117 | $346 | |
540M vs 640M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$117 | $40 | |
540M vs 430M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$117 | ||
540M vs 640LM | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||