Intel Core i5 520M vs Celeron T3500 |
Released January, 2010
Intel Core i5 520M
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 520M
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron T3500 vs the Core i5 520M. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 520M vs Celeron T3500
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 520M | vs | Celeron T3500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1288 | |||
| rPGA 988A | |||
| 478 | |||
| P | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 13.49 pt/W | 2.47 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
details | Core i5 520M | vs | Celeron T3500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 382,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.86 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,455.5 | 307.1 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.86 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 500 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 766 MHz | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Core i5 520M  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron T3500 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $40 | $332 | |
| Intel Core i5 520M vs 2520M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $40 | $259 | |
| Intel Core i5 520M vs i7 620M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $40 | $211 | |
| Intel Core i5 520M vs Core2 Duo P8600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $40 | $80 | |
| Intel Core i5 520M vs 560M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $40 | $312 | |
| Intel Core i5 520M vs 3320M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $40 | $346 | |
| Intel Core i5 520M vs i7 640M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $40 | $107 | |
| Intel Core i5 520M vs Celeron N2840 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $398 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $361 | $464 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $239 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
