Intel Core i5 5200U vs 4210U

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 5200U

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 5200U vs the 4210U.

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4210U

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 4210U vs the 5200U.

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 5200U

19.78 mHash/s

Core i5 4210U

12.73 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 5200U

0.71 fps

Core i5 4210U

0.96 fps

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

Core i5 5200U

2,740

Core i5 4210U

2,376

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

Core i5 5200U

2,399

Core i5 4210U

2,350

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

Core i5 5200U

4,479

Core i5 4210U

4,051

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 5200U

5,017

Core i5 4210U

4,612

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 5200U

2,474

Core i5 4210U

2,375

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 5200U

3,380,000 MB/s

Core i5 4210U

3,070,000 MB/s

summary	Core i5 5200U	4210U
Clock speed	2.2 GHz	1.7 GHz
Turbo clock speed	2.7 GHz	2.7 GHz
Cores	Dual core	Dual core
Is unlocked	No	No
features
Has a NX bit	Yes	Yes
Has virtualization support	Yes	Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes	Yes
power consumption
TDP	15W	15W
Annual home energy cost	3.61 $/year	3.61 $/year
Performance per watt	42.03 pt/W	38.8 pt/W
Typical power consumption	12.19W	12.19W
bus
Architecture	DMI 2.0	DMI 2.0
Number of links	1	1
Transfer rate	5,000 MT/s	5,000 MT/s

details	Core i5 5200U	4210U
Architecture	x86-64	x86-64
Threads	4	4
L2 cache	0.5 MB	0.5 MB
L2 cache per core	0.25 MB/core	0.25 MB/core
L3 cache	3 MB	3 MB
L3 cache per core	1.5 MB/core	1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process	14 nm	22 nm
Max CPUs	1	1
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	2.61 GHz	2.54 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	2.61 GHz	2.54 GHz
integrated graphics
GPU	GPU	GPU
Label	Intel® HD Graphics 5500	Intel® HD Graphics 4400
Number of displays supported	3	3
GPU clock speed	300 MHz	200 MHz
Turbo clock speed	900 MHz	1,000 MHz
memory controller
Memory controller	Built-in	Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3L-1333
LPDDR3-1333
DDR3
LPDDR3-1600
Channels	Dual Channel	Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth	25,600 MB/s	25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size	16,384 MB	16,384 MB

Intel Core i5 5200U

Report a correction

Intel Core i5 4210U

Report a correction

Laptops

Looking for a laptop?

91 laptops with the Intel Core i5 5200U, starting from $375
52 laptops with the Intel Core i5 4210U, starting from $380

Compare

Popular Comparisons

Comments

Showing 8 comments.

André Nunes (06:16 PM, October 20, 2015)

So, 1 year ago and 1 generation ahead and nothing has changed. I don't understand it a lot but the clock speed on 4th generation is 1.7GHz and the 5th generation is 2.2GHz. Is that all revelant for performance in games, 3d modelling, graphic design or whatever?

Сергей (01:04 AM, July 1, 2015)

sorry for late reply, I don't enter this site often. For games like Battlefield 4 definitely go for quad core i5(if you are talking about desktop, if not then quad core i7 for laptop), it's one of the most processor demanding games for which quad procesors are highly recommended. A dual core i5 or i7 would run it decently(if we are talking about laptop gaming) or core i3(if we are talking about desktop gaming), but if you are aiming at high end gaming with an expensive videocard(Geforce GTX 770 or higher)get an Intel quad core

Al Motassim Abu Shomar (07:06 PM, June 25, 2015)

hello Сергей it look like you know a lot about processors, so can you tell which is the best processor for gaming is it intel i5 or i7 or other time and should it be quad core what do you advice? i also need it for big games like battlefield 4

Сергей (11:39 PM, June 10, 2015)

I don't think the mobile processors will change the amount of cores. also, Haswell wasn't a big improvement over Ivy Bridge on the same 22 process while ivy bridge was over Sandy bridge when it just came out. They also delayed 5-th generation for a year and this is what we're getting? a tiny multycore perfomance improvement and WORSE single core perfomance?

KrissKey (11:57 AM, June 4, 2015)

They have to improve manufacturing process, give them time its a new process (14nm), should be better in near future. Especially power consumption is lower. I expect much lower frequency per core but more cores in the future and lower power consumption. I expect 2016th can be interesting.

Сергей (07:51 PM, April 18, 2015)

yes it is, quite pathetic actually, not only it didn't even get near Ivy bridge's improvement in mobile segment, it even became WORSE at some things(single core perfomance)

Shivaprasad.Velakaturi (05:57 AM, April 14, 2015)

Thank you for giving a cut short results....

Bruno Pally (06:35 PM, April 10, 2015)

IS 5° GENERATION 14NM

	VS
$281
5200U vs 7410

	VS
$281		$281
5200U vs 6200U

	VS
$281		$393
5200U vs 5500U

	VS
$281		$161
5200U vs N3700

	VS
$281		$275
5200U vs 5005U

	VS
$281		$393
5200U vs 4510U

	VS
$281		$393
4210U vs 4510U

	VS
$305		$300
W3520 vs 2500

	VS
$272		$350
4790K vs 6700K

	VS
$281
4200U vs 6410

	VS
$281
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410

	VS
$134		$225
847 vs 3217U

	VS
$275		$161
4005U vs N3540

	VS
$250		$350
6600K vs 6700K

Intel Core i5 5200U vs 4210U