CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5200U vs 3225 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i3 3225 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3225  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 5200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 5200U

Report a correction
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 14.84 mPixels/s vs 8.45 mPixels/s More than 75% better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Much better performance per watt 42.03 pt/W vs 2.97 pt/W Around 14.2x better performance per watt
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 44.69W 3.7x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per dollar 2.24 pt/$ vs 1.46 pt/$ Around 55% better performance per dollar
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Sep, 2012 Release date over 2 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 13.25 $/year 3.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 48.18 $/year 3.7x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i3 3225

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3225

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 300 MHz Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 15% better turbo clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.49 GHz vs 2.61 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,773 vs 1,414 More than 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 5200U vs i3 3225

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 5200U
19.78 mHash/s
Core i3 3225
5.78 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 5200U
0.71 fps
Core i3 3225
0.81 fps

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 5200U
3,380,000 MB/s
Core i3 3225
169,900 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 5200U  vs
i3 3225 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 55W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 48.18 $/year
Performance per watt 42.03 pt/W 2.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 44.69W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i5 5200U  vs
i3 3225 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.61 GHz 3.49 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 3.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.61 GHz 3.49 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 5500 Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 300 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 900 MHz 1,050 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Core i5 5200U
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 3225
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus