CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5200U vs J1900 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 5200U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 5200U  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 5200U

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 5200U

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 5200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 5200U

Report a correction
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 14.84 mPixels/s vs 0.39 mPixels/s Around 38x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Much better performance per watt 42.03 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W More than 9.8x better performance per watt
Much better performance per dollar 2.24 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ More than 4.2x better performance per dollar
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher turbo clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.42 GHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,414 vs 534 Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,017 vs 2,927 More than 70% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better turbo clock speed 900 MHz vs 854 MHz More than 5% better turbo clock speed
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Oct, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.61 GHz vs 2.42 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 300 MHz More than 2.2x higher GPU clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Slightly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 12.19W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 3.61 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 13.14 $/year Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 5200U vs Celeron J1900

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 5200U
19.78 mHash/s
Celeron J1900
1.78 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core i5 5200U
14.84 mPixels/s
Celeron J1900
0.39 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 5200U
0.71 fps
Celeron J1900
-1 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 5200U
3,380,000 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 5200U  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.42 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 5500 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 300 MHz 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed 900 MHz 854 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 8,192 MB

details

Core i5 5200U  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.61 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.61 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 15W 10W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 42.03 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 8.13W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core i5 5200U
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus