Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 5200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 5200U

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 42.03 pt/W vs 5.23 pt/W More than 8x better performance per watt
Much better performance per dollar 2.24 pt/$ vs 0.73 pt/$ More than 3x better performance per dollar
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better turbo clock speed 900 MHz vs 750 MHz 20% better turbo clock speed
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,414 vs 554 More than 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better PassMark score 3,502 vs 1,037 Around 3.5x better PassMark score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Jul, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.61 GHz vs 2.41 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of Intel Celeron J1750

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1750

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 300 MHz More than 2.2x higher GPU clock speed
Higher clock speed 2.41 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Slightly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 12.19W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.41 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 3.61 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 13.14 $/year Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 5200U vs Celeron J1750

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 5200U  vs
Celeron J1750 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.41 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 5500 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 300 MHz 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed 900 MHz 750 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 8,192 MB

details

Core i5 5200U  vs
Celeron J1750 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.61 GHz 2.41 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 2.41 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.61 GHz 2.41 GHz

power consumption

TDP 15W 10W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 42.03 pt/W 5.23 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 8.13W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core i5 5200U
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1750
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus