Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 5200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 5200U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 42.03 pt/W vs 3.66 pt/W Around 11.5x better performance per watt
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 60.94W 5x lower typical power consumption
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 2,474 vs 1,372 More than 80% better geekbench 3 single core score
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Nov, 2008 Release date over 6 years later
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 65.7 $/year 5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 18.07 $/year 5x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 8384

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 8384

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 24,266 vs 5,017 More than 4.8x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
More l3 cache 6 MB vs 3 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 5200U vs Opteron 8384

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 5200U
3,380,000 MB/s
Opteron 8384
161.4 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 5200U  vs
Opteron 8384 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 75W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 18.07 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 65.7 $/year
Performance per watt 42.03 pt/W 3.66 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 60.94W

details

Core i5 5200U  vs
Opteron 8384 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 8

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.61 GHz 2.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 2.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.61 GHz 2.7 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 5500 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 300 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 900 MHz N/A
Intel Core i5 5200U
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 8384
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus