0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 4690K vs AMD FX 9590 |
Released April, 2014
Intel Core i5 4690K
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 4690K
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD FX 9590 vs the Intel Core i5 4690K. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4690K vs FX 9590
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 4690K
11,924
FX 9590
13,818
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 4690K
3,649
FX 9590
2,549
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 4690K
5,060,000 MB/s
FX 9590
2,790,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 4690K
11,872
FX 9590
12,725
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 4690K
12,942
FX 9590
13,802
GeekBench
Core i5 4690K
12,942
FX 9590
13,802
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i5 4690K
7,767
FX 9590
10,589
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i5 4690K
2,237
FX 9590
1,741
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 4690K | vs | FX 9590 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 5 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
ABM | |||
BMI1 | |||
CLMUL | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
TBM | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 88W | 220W | |
Annual home energy cost | 21.2 $/year | 53 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 77.09 $/year | 192.72 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 10.77 pt/W | 5.39 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 71.5W | 178.75W |
details | Core i5 4690K | vs | FX 9590 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 8 | |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.72°C | Unknown - 57°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 5.06 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.58 GHz | 5.06 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 4,652.1 | 10,860 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.51 GHz | 5.06 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1866 | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 29,866.66 MB/s |
Intel Core i5 4690K ![]() | AMD FX 9590 ![]() |
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 1 desktop with the Intel Core i5 4690K, starting from $1,195
- 3 desktops with the AMD FX 9590, starting from $1,699
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $240 | |
4790K vs 4690K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $240 | |
6600K vs 4690K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$128 | $240 | |
8350 vs 4690K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$192 | $240 | |
4670K vs 4690K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $240 | |
4690 vs 4690K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $240 | |
4790 vs 4690K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $230 | |
6700K vs 9590 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 25 comments.
Cloaked9000 (11:53 AM, February 23, 2017)
Lino Pugliari (11:39 AM, February 23, 2017)
Lino Pugliari (11:38 AM, February 23, 2017)
Cloaked9000 (07:35 PM, February 22, 2017)
Catalin Shadx (04:41 PM, February 1, 2017)
Lino Pugliari (09:03 AM, October 20, 2016)
jacob (12:15 AM, October 12, 2016)
Lino Pugliari (11:40 AM, July 29, 2016)
Lino Pugliari (11:31 AM, July 29, 2016)
Lino Pugliari (10:25 AM, July 29, 2016)
Lino Pugliari (09:00 AM, July 29, 2016)
Matt Kam (11:17 PM, March 22, 2016)
That Guy (03:47 AM, February 15, 2016)
Evan Cox (04:32 AM, November 18, 2015)
Nexus Radical (10:30 AM, November 8, 2015)
Miguel (10:54 PM, October 30, 2015)
Mombasa69 (11:42 AM, October 9, 2015)
Emerald_Shine5850 (04:36 AM, September 19, 2015)
Bharath Narayan (08:21 AM, August 8, 2015)
Sugomi (08:59 AM, July 19, 2015)
JrHorseh (04:54 AM, July 13, 2015)
AdK (08:44 AM, July 9, 2015)
Therion (06:56 PM, June 4, 2015)
Hunter Wright (03:14 AM, May 14, 2015)
Edward Grunloh (05:57 AM, May 2, 2015)