0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 4690K vs AMD FX 8350 |
Released April, 2014
Intel Core i5 4690K
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 4690K
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD FX 8350 vs the Intel Core i5 4690K. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4690K vs FX 8350
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 4690K
11,924
FX 8350
11,483
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 4690K
3,649
FX 8350
2,193
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 4690K
5,060,000 MB/s
FX 8350
2,470,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 4690K
11,872
FX 8350
10,956
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 4690K
12,942
FX 8350
12,126
GeekBench
Core i5 4690K
12,942
FX 8350
12,796
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i5 4690K
7,767
FX 8350
9,134
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i5 4690K
2,237
FX 8350
1,525
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 4690K | vs | FX 8350 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4.2 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
ABM | |||
BMI1 | |||
CLMUL | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
TBM | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 88W | 125W | |
Annual home energy cost | 21.2 $/year | 56.1 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 77.09 $/year | 159.62 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 10.77 pt/W | 5.72 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 71.5W | 159.66W |
details | Core i5 4690K | vs | FX 8350 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 8 | |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.72°C | Unknown - 61°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.58 GHz | 8.79 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 4,652.1 | 10,147 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.51 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1866 | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 29,866.66 MB/s |
Intel Core i5 4690K ![]() | AMD FX 8350 ![]() |
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 1 desktop with the Intel Core i5 4690K, starting from $1,195
- 2 desktops with the AMD FX 8350, starting from $3,177
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $272 | |
4690K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $250 | |
4690K vs 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $192 | |
4690K vs 4670K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $225 | |
4690K vs 4690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $305 | |
4690K vs 4790 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$128 | $264 | |
8350 vs 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$128 | $100 | |
8350 vs 6300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 25 comments.
Cordtus (10:55 PM, November 12, 2019)
SamLDawg (06:44 PM, August 20, 2016)
Tobias Julian Syversen (09:15 PM, June 8, 2016)
Joseph S. (11:56 PM, May 4, 2016)
michael ray (04:10 PM, May 4, 2016)
Joseph S. (12:11 AM, May 4, 2016)
michael ray (11:46 AM, April 14, 2016)
Jorge Yokiro (04:58 PM, February 17, 2016)
Jorge Yokiro (04:55 PM, February 17, 2016)
Skilledz Manu (01:41 AM, February 17, 2016)
That Guy (03:41 AM, February 15, 2016)
SkyMembrane (11:44 PM, January 6, 2016)
Joseph S. (05:08 AM, December 30, 2015)
Balhaar (06:59 AM, December 29, 2015)
Balhaar (06:53 AM, December 29, 2015)
Jeremy Hansen (04:46 PM, December 5, 2015)
Andrei-Florin Gogan (04:17 PM, November 7, 2015)
Alexander Binovski (09:53 AM, October 30, 2015)
Ericson (02:51 PM, October 29, 2015)
Alexander Binovski (01:08 PM, October 29, 2015)
Alexander Binovski (12:55 PM, October 29, 2015)
Ericson (02:03 AM, October 29, 2015)
Alexander Binovski (11:58 PM, October 28, 2015)
Ericson (04:31 AM, October 28, 2015)
Alexander Binovski (04:24 AM, October 28, 2015)