Intel Core i5 4690K vs AMD Athlon 46 |
Released April, 2014
Intel Core i5 4690K
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 4690K
 | Is unlocked Yes | | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
| | Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Athlon 46
- 2.1 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon 46
| | Much lower typical power consumption 20.31W | | Much lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year |
| | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.1 GHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 10.77 pt/W | vs | 0.77 pt/W | Around 14x better performance per watt | |||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 7,767 | vs | 473 | Around 16.5x better PassMark score | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 20.31W | vs | 71.5W | 3.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | vs | 21.2 $/year | 3.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | vs | 77.09 $/year | 3.5x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4690K vs Athlon 46
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 4690K | vs | Athlon 46 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Single core | |
| Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Core i5 4690K | vs | Athlon 46 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 1 | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 65 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 88W | 25W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 21.2 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 77.09 $/year | 21.9 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 10.77 pt/W | 0.77 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 71.5W | 20.31W | |
 Intel Core i5 4690K  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 46 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $240 | $272 | |
| 4690K vs 4790K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | $250 | |
| 4690K vs 6600K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | $128 | |
| 4690K vs 8350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | $192 | |
| 4690K vs 4670K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | $225 | |
| 4690K vs 4690 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | $305 | |
| 4690K vs 4790 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | $190 | |
| 4690K vs 4460 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
| | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
