0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 4690 vs AMD Opteron 6328 |
Released May, 2014
Intel Core i5 4690
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 4690
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
![]() | Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 11 pt/W |
VS
Released November, 2012
AMD Opteron 6328
- 3.2 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 6328
![]() | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | ![]() | Significantly more l3 cache 16 MB |
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 | ![]() | Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 19,224 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i5 4690CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much better performance per watt | 11 pt/W | vs | 2.08 pt/W | More than 5.2x better performance per watt | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 93.44W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,214 | vs | 1,311 | Around 70% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Newer | May, 2014 | vs | Nov, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 27.7 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 100.74 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly more l3 cache | 16 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 2.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 19,224 | vs | 11,272 | More than 70% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4690 vs Opteron 6328
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 4690
11,272
Opteron 6328
19,224
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 4690
3,527
Opteron 6328
2,110
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 4690
4,870,000 MB/s
Opteron 6328
2,280 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i5 4690
7,614
Opteron 6328
7,813
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i5 4690
2,214
Opteron 6328
1,311
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 4690 | vs | Opteron 6328 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1150 | |||
G34 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
ABM | |||
BMI1 | |||
CLMUL | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
TBM | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s |
details | Core i5 4690 | vs | Opteron 6328 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 16 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 4 | |
Clock multiplier | 32 | 19 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.72°C | Unknown - 71.7°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 84W | 115W | |
Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 27.7 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 100.74 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 11 pt/W | 2.08 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 93.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI 2.0 | HyperTransport 3.0 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s |
Intel Core i5 4690 ![]() | AMD Opteron 6328 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $225 | |
Intel Core i7 4790 vs i5 4690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $225 | |
Intel Core i5 4690K vs 4690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $225 | |
Intel Core i5 4590 vs 4690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$190 | $225 | |
Intel Core i5 4460 vs 4690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$176 | $225 | |
Intel Core i5 4670 vs 4690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $225 | |
Intel Core i5 6600 vs 4690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $225 | |
Intel Core i7 3770 vs i5 4690 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||