Winner
Intel Core i5 4690
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 4690 based on its .
See full details| | Intel Core i5 4690 vs AMD FX 8320 |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Newer manufacturing process 22 nms |
| | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,237 | | Significantly better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score 7,515 |
| | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | | Is unlocked Yes |
| | More cores 8 | | More l3 cache 8 MB |
by Ramish-Zafar (Jun, 2014)The enthusiast has managed to overclock the processor to a staggering 8171.53 MHz.
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Core i5 4690 8.1 FX 8320 7.8 | |
| Cinebench R10 32-bit and Passmark | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Core i5 4690 9.8 FX 8320 7.8 | |
| Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Core i5 4690 5.0 FX 8320 10.0 | |
| Unlocked | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Core i5 4690 7.8 FX 8320 7.7 | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
| Core i5 4690 8.6 FX 8320 7.9 | |
Intel Core i5 4690CPUBoss Winner | | |
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 32 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,237 | vs | 1,402 | Around 60% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Significantly better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score | 7,515 | vs | 3,987 | Around 90% better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 50% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Marginally newer | May, 2014 | vs | Oct, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Better cinebench r10 32Bit score | 27,283 | vs | 20,870 | More than 30% better cinebench r10 32Bit score | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
| More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
summary | Core i5 4690 | vs | FX 8320 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1150 | |||
| AM3+ | |||
| Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| XOP | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| F16C | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| SSE Family | |||
| FMA | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| Typical power consumption | N/A | 101.56W | |
details | Core i5 4690 | vs | FX 8320 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz | N/A | |
| Intel Core i5 4690 | AMD FX 8320 |
| VS | |
| $143 | $175 | |
| 8320 vs 8350 | ||
| VS | |
| $143 | $110 | |
| 8320 vs 6300 | ||
| VS | |
| $195 | $195 | |
| 4690 vs 4790 | ||
| VS | |
| $195 | $175 | |
| 4690 vs 8350 | ||
| VS | |
| $195 | $195 | |
| 4690 vs 4590 | ||
| VS | |
| $195 | $240 | |
| 4690 vs 4690K | ||
| VS | |
| $195 | $235 | |
| 4690 vs 4670K | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $249 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | $161 | |
| 3110M vs N3530 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $340 | |
| 4770K vs 4790K | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | ||
| 3217U vs N2830 | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | $97 | |
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | ||
| 5750M vs 4700MQ | ||
| VS | |
| 5 Octa vs 800 | ||