CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4670K vs 6402P among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

9.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 4670K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 4670K  based on its value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 4670K

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 4670K

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4670K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4670K

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much better performance per dollar 4.9 pt/$ vs 1.06 pt/$ More than 4.5x better performance per dollar
Higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Much better turbo clock speed 1,200 MHz vs 950 MHz More than 25% better turbo clock speed
Much better performance per watt 11.19 pt/W vs 3.06 pt/W Around 3.8x better performance per watt
Better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score 13.68 fps vs 8.45 fps More than 60% better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 11,554 vs 10,582 Around 10% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.48 GHz vs 3.88 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score 2,195 vs 2,068 More than 5% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz vs 3.36 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel 6402P

Reasons to consider the
Intel 6402P

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 68.25W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Newer Oct, 2015 vs Apr, 2013 Release date over 2 years later
Lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 20.24 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 73.58 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4670K vs 6402P

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 4670K
16.37 mHash/s
6402P
13.71 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core i5 4670K
17.14 mPixels/s
6402P
12.41 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 4670K
1.72 fps
6402P
0.78 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4670K
11,554
6402P
10,582

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

6402P
3,337

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4670K
4,930,000 MB/s
6402P
4,470 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

6402P
7,711

PassMark (Single Core)

6402P
2,068

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 4670K  vs
6402P 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 2.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 84W 65W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 11.19 pt/W 3.06 pt/W
Typical power consumption 68.25W 52.81W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 FSB
Number of links 0 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 8,000 MT/s

details

Core i5 4670K  vs
6402P 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.72°C Unknown - 71°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.48 GHz 3.88 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz 3.36 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.48 GHz 3.88 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Intel® HD Graphics 510
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,200 MHz 950 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 65,536 MB
Intel Core i5 4670K
Report a correction
Intel 6402P
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus