Intel Core i5 4670K vs AMD FX 8320

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4670K

Report a correction

Has a built-in GPU

Yes

Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8320

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD FX 8320 vs the Intel Core i5 4670K.

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4670K

11,554

FX 8320

10,352

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4670K

3,569

FX 8320

2,066

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4670K

4,930,000 MB/s

FX 8320

2,320,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4670K

11,573

FX 8320

9,798

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4670K

12,725

FX 8320

10,594

GeekBench

Core i5 4670K

12,725

FX 8320

11,631

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i5 4670K

7,618

FX 8320

8,183

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i5 4670K

2,195

FX 8320

1,402

summary	Core i5 4670K	FX 8320
Clock speed	3.4 GHz	3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed	3.8 GHz	4 GHz
Cores	Quad core	Octa core
Is unlocked	Yes	Yes
features
Has a NX bit	Yes	Yes
Has virtualization support	Yes	Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes	Yes
power consumption
TDP	84W	125W
Annual home energy cost	20.24 $/year	30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost	73.58 $/year	109.5 $/year
Performance per watt	11.19 pt/W	7.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption	68.25W	101.56W

details	Core i5 4670K	FX 8320
Architecture	x86-64	x86-64
Threads	4	8
L2 cache	1 MB	8 MB
L2 cache per core	0.25 MB/core	1 MB/core
L3 cache	6 MB	8 MB
L3 cache per core	1.5 MB/core	1 MB/core
Manufacture process	22 nm	32 nm
Max CPUs	1	1
Operating temperature	Unknown - 72.72°C	Unknown - 61.1°C
overclocking
Overclock popularity	57	63
Overclocked clock speed	4.48 GHz	4.56 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	4.55 GHz	4.75 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked)	5,198.5	9,317
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	4.48 GHz	4.56 GHz
integrated graphics
GPU	GPU	None
Label	Intel® HD Graphics 4600	N/A
Number of displays supported	3	N/A
GPU clock speed	350 MHz	N/A
Turbo clock speed	1,200 MHz	N/A
memory controller
Memory controller	Built-in	Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
Channels	Dual Channel	Dual Channel
Supports ECC	No	Yes
Maximum bandwidth	25,600 MB/s	29,866.66 MB/s

Intel Core i5 4670K

Report a correction

AMD FX 8320

Report a correction

Compare

Popular Comparisons

Comments

Showing 3 comments.

walter (06:45 PM, April 13, 2017)

Cpu boss is wrong Cpu boss is liar

CL (09:25 AM, October 28, 2015)

I like it how they tweak the results so Intel gets ahead. On this test the fx gets 7.4 and on another one 8.0 :))) using the same benchmarks :)) Based on this they have a comparison where an i3 4170 is better that fx 8320 :))))))))))))))))))))))

Antares8001 (06:39 PM, March 8, 2015)

Seriously? According to you the i5 outperforms the FX 8320 in benchmarks using all cores. Thats a joke right?

	VS
$248		$192
4770K vs 4670K

	VS
$128		$192
8350 vs 4670K

	VS
$240		$192
4690K vs 4670K

	VS
$184		$192
3570K vs 4670K

	VS
$176		$192
4670 vs 4670K

	VS
$128		$140
8350 vs 8320

	VS
$100		$140
6300 vs 8320

	VS
$300		$305
2500 vs W3520

	VS
$350		$272
6700K vs 4790K

	VS
		$281
6410 vs 4200U

	VS
		$281
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U

	VS
$225		$134
3217U vs 847

	VS
$161		$275
N3540 vs 4005U

	VS
$350		$250
6700K vs 6600K

Intel Core i5 4670K vs AMD FX 8320