Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 4590

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 4590

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4590

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4590

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher turbo clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,113 vs 1,031 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly lower typical power consumption 68.25W vs 93.44W More than 25% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better performance per watt 10.33 pt/W vs 6.03 pt/W More than 70% better performance per watt
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 72.72 °C vs 55 °C More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Newer May, 2014 vs Nov, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year vs 27.7 $/year More than 25% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year vs 100.74 $/year More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 6276

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 6276

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 16 MB vs 1 MB 16x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l3 cache 16 MB vs 6 MB Around 2.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 16 vs 4 12 more cores; run more applications at once
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
More threads 16 vs 4 12 more threads
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Better PassMark score 9,011 vs 7,229 Around 25% better PassMark score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4590 vs Opteron 6276

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4590
10,601
Opteron 6276
22,325

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4590
4,650,000 MB/s
Opteron 6276
1,320,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 4590  vs
Opteron 6276 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 2.3 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.7 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Quad core 16 core
Socket type
LGA 1150
G34
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 HyperTransport 3.0
Number of links 0 4
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 6,400 MT/s

details

Core i5 4590  vs
Opteron 6276 
Threads 4 16
L2 cache 1 MB 16 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 16 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 4
Clock multiplier 33 16
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.72°C Unknown - 55°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 84W 115W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 27.7 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 100.74 $/year
Performance per watt 10.33 pt/W 6.03 pt/W
Typical power consumption 68.25W 93.44W
Intel Core i5 4590
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 6276
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus