Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4570TE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4570TE

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 93.6W 3.3x lower typical power consumption
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 27.75 $/year 3.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 100.92 $/year 3.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Apr, 2013 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
Front view of Intel Core i5 2400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2400

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 4.58 pt/$ vs 0.81 pt/$ Around 5.8x better performance per dollar
Much higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz vs 350 MHz Around 2.5x higher GPU clock speed
Higher clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 10% better turbo clock speed
Slightly more l3 cache 6 MB vs 4 MB 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly better performance per watt 8.14 pt/W vs 4.45 pt/W Around 85% better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.54 GHz vs 2.7 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,742 vs 1,371 More than 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 5,901 vs 3,861 Around 55% better PassMark score
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72.6 °C vs 66.35 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.51 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4570TE vs 2400

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 4570TE  vs
2400 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 3.1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.3 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 95W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 27.75 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 100.92 $/year
Performance per watt 4.45 pt/W 8.14 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 93.6W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i5 4570TE  vs
2400 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 66.35°C Unknown - 72.6°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.7 GHz 3.54 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.7 GHz 3.51 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.7 GHz 3.54 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Intel® HD Graphics 2000
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 850 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 1,100 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Core i5 4570TE
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 2400
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus