Winner
Intel Core i5 4570
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 4570 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details Intel Core i5 4570 vs AMD Opteron 6136 |
Released April, 2013
Intel Core i5 4570
- 3.2 GHz
- Quad core
9.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 4570
 | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,068 |
VS
Released March, 2010
AMD Opteron 6136
- 2.4 GHz
- Octa core
4.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 6136
| | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 |
| | More l3 cache 12 MB | | More cores 8 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4570 vs 6136 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 9.1 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i5 4570CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,068 | vs | 534 | More than 3.8x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 10.1 pt/W | vs | 1.44 pt/W | More than 7x better performance per watt | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 93.44W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 72.72 °C | vs | 55 °C | More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Better PassMark score | 7,068 | vs | 4,631 | Around 55% better PassMark score | |||
| Newer | Apr, 2013 | vs | Mar, 2010 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 27.7 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 100.74 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| More l3 cache | 12 MB | vs | 6 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4570 vs Opteron 6136
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 4570 | vs | Opteron 6136 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 84W | 115W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 27.7 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 100.74 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 10.1 pt/W | 1.44 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 93.44W | |
details | Core i5 4570 | vs | Opteron 6136 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 12 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 4 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.72°C | Unknown - 55°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 0 | 0 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI 2.0 | HyperTransport 3.0 | |
 Intel Core i5 4570  Report a correction |  AMD Opteron 6136 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $190 | $160 | |
| 4460 vs 4570 | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | $160 | |
| 3470 vs 4570 | ||
 | VS | |
| $160 | ||
| 5545M vs 4570 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $160 | |
| 4590 vs 4570 | ||
 | VS | |
| $240 | $160 | |
| 3770 vs 4570 | ||
 | VS | |
| $168 | $160 | |
| 3570 vs 4570 | ||
 | VS | |
| $176 | $160 | |
| 4670 vs 4570 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
