Winner
Intel Core i5 4570
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 4570 based on its .
See full details| | Intel Core i5 4570 vs AMD FX 8320 |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Newer manufacturing process 22 nms |
| | Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 2,068 | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 68.25W |
by Tech RadarIf your budget is super skinny, that price tag could make all the difference and we'd vote 4570.
| | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | | Is unlocked Yes |
| | Higher turbo clock speed 4 GHz | | More cores 8 |
by Ramish-Zafar (Jun, 2014)The enthusiast has managed to overclock the processor to a staggering 8171.53 MHz.
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Core i5 4570 7.4 FX 8320 7.5 | |
| Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Core i5 4570 9.5 FX 8320 8.0 | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Core i5 4570 8.4 FX 8320 9.8 | |
| Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Core i5 4570 7.3 FX 8320 7.7 | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
| Core i5 4570 8.3 FX 8320 7.8 | |
Intel Core i5 4570CPUBoss Winner | | |
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 32 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,068 | vs | 1,402 | Around 50% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 101.56W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 50% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Better performance per watt | 12.19 pt/W | vs | 6.75 pt/W | More than 80% better performance per watt | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 109.5 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 30.11 $/year | Around 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Marginally newer | Apr, 2013 | vs | Oct, 2012 | Release date 5 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 3.6 GHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| More l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Overclocked) score | 9,317 | vs | 6,808 | More than 35% better PassMark (Overclocked) score | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.65 GHz | vs | 3.61 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better PassMark score | 8,183 | vs | 7,068 | More than 15% better PassMark score | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 5.89 pt/$ | vs | 5.12 pt/$ | More than 15% better performance per dollar | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.82 GHz | vs | 3.73 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
summary | Core i5 4570 | vs | FX 8320 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
| Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| XOP | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| F16C | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| SSE Family | |||
| FMA | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | N/A | |
details | Core i5 4570 | vs | FX 8320 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 0 | 63 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.61 GHz | 4.65 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.73 GHz | 4.82 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 6,808 | 9,317 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.61 GHz | 4.65 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 84W | 125W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 30.11 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 109.5 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 12.19 pt/W | 6.75 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 101.56W | |
| Intel Core i5 4570 | AMD FX 8320 |
| VS | |
| $170 | $143 | |
| 8350 vs 8320 | ||
| VS | |
| $110 | $143 | |
| 6300 vs 8320 | ||
| VS | |
| $195 | $143 | |
| 4440 vs 8320 | ||
| VS | |
| $200 | ||
| 5545M vs 4570 | ||
| VS | |
| $195 | $200 | |
| 4460 vs 4570 | ||
| VS | |
| $170 | $200 | |
| 8350 vs 4570 | ||
| VS | |
| $195 | $200 | |
| 4590 vs 4570 | ||
| VS | |
| $253 | $325 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| VS | |
| $161 | $225 | |
| N3530 vs 3110M | ||
| VS | |
| $105 | $281 | |
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | ||
| N2830 vs 3217U | ||
| VS | |
| $340 | $325 | |
| 4790K vs 4770K | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | ||
| 4700MQ vs 5750M | ||
| VS | |
| 800 vs 5 Octa | ||