Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 4460

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 4460

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4460

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4460

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 59.6 vs 28 Around 2.2x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 4.26 pt/$ vs 0.39 pt/$ Around 11x better performance per dollar
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,946 vs 721 Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
More l3 cache 6 MB vs 3 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly better PassMark score 6,664 vs 1,778 Around 3.8x better PassMark score
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Significantly better performance per watt 9.64 pt/W vs 5.16 pt/W More than 85% better performance per watt
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 10% better turbo clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer May, 2014 vs Jan, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Core i3 2375M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2375M

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 68.25W 4.9x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 72.72 °C Around 40% higher Maximum operating temperature
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 4.9x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 4.9x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4460 vs i3 2375M

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4460
4,300,000 MB/s
Core i3 2375M
74,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 4460  vs
i3 2375M 
Clock speed 3.2 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s

details

Core i5 4460  vs
i3 2375M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.72°C Unknown - 100°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz 1,000 MHz

power consumption

TDP 84W 17W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 14.89 $/year
Performance per watt 9.64 pt/W 5.16 pt/W
Typical power consumption 68.25W 13.81W
Intel Core i5 4460
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 2375M
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus