0 Comments
| | Intel Core i5 4460 vs AMD FX 8350 |
Released May, 2014
Intel Core i5 4460
- 3.2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 4460
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Newer manufacturing process 22 nms |
| | More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core | | Marginally newer May, 2014 |
VS
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 8350
- 4 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the AMD FX 8350
| | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 4.2 GHz |
| | Is unlocked Yes | | Significantly higher clock speed 4 GHz |
by Tech Radar (Nov, 2012)Like the K Series Intel chips, the entire FX range is unlocked, so overclocking is definitely on the menu.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 32 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 50% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Marginally newer | May, 2014 | vs | Oct, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 4.2 GHz | vs | 3.4 GHz | Around 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Features Key features of the Core i5 4460 vs FX 8350
clock speed
Core i5 4460
3.2 GHz
FX 8350
4 GHz
FX 8350 | by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)If we factor in the new Turbo Core 3 technology we can expect a bigger performance gain according to AMD.
turbo clock speed
Core i5 4460
3.4 GHz
FX 8350
4.2 GHz
L2 cache
Core i5 4460
1 MB
FX 8350
8 MB
L3 cache
Core i5 4460
6 MB
FX 8350
8 MB
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 4460 | vs | FX 8350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1150 | |||
| AM3+ | |||
| Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| XOP | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| F16C | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| Typical power consumption | N/A | 159.66W | |
details | Core i5 4460 | vs | FX 8350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 29,866.66 MB/s | |
| Intel Core i5 4460 | AMD FX 8350 |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
| VS | |
| $177 | $235 | |
| 8350 vs 4670K | ||
| VS | |
| $177 | $325 | |
| 8350 vs 4770K | ||
| VS | |
| $177 | $330 | |
| 8350 vs 3770K | ||
| VS | |
| $177 | $143 | |
| 8350 vs 8320 | ||
| VS | |
| $177 | $230 | |
| 8350 vs 3570K | ||
| VS | |
| $177 | $166 | |
| 8350 vs 7850K | ||
| VS | |
| $177 | $240 | |
| 8350 vs 4690K | ||
Popular Comparisons
| VS | |
| $325 | $253 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | $161 | |
| 3110M vs N3530 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $340 | |
| 4770K vs 4790K | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | ||
| 3217U vs N2830 | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | $97 | |
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| VS | |
| 5 Octa vs 800 | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | ||
| 5750M vs 4700MQ | ||





