Winner
Intel Core i5 3570
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3570 based on its .
See full details| | Intel Core i5 4440 vs 3570 |
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 68.25W | | Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 72.72 °C |
| | Better performance per watt 11.31 pt/W | | Better performance per dollar 4.87 pt/$ |
| | Higher turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz | | Higher clock speed 3.4 GHz |
| | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz | | Supports trusted computing Yes |
by Anthony-Garreffa (Feb, 2012)You were pretty hectic to own one of those bad boys and these days, with the likes of eBay's and mainstream (and more accepted) overclocking, it's not as cool, but it still gets my nerd juices flowing.
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Core i5 4440 7.2 Core i5 3570 7.3 | |
| Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Core i5 4440 9.1 Core i5 3570 9.3 | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Core i5 4440 7.1 Core i5 3570 7.5 | |
| Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Core i5 4440 7.3 Core i5 3570 6.9 | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
| Core i5 4440 7.9 Core i5 3570 8.1 | |
| | | Intel Core i5 3570CPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 107.5W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher Maximum Operating Temperature | 72.72 °C | vs | 67 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum Operating Temperature | |||
| Better performance per watt | 11.31 pt/W | vs | 7.16 pt/W | Around 60% better performance per watt | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 4.87 pt/$ | vs | 4.07 pt/$ | Around 20% better performance per dollar | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 38.81 $/year | Around 50% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Marginally newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Jun, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 106 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 3.8 GHz | vs | 3.3 GHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | More than 85% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.09 GHz | vs | 3.29 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | vs | 1,100 MHz | Around 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,989 | vs | 1,889 | More than 5% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better PassMark (Overclocked) score | 4,357.3 | vs | 3,691.6 | Around 20% better PassMark (Overclocked) score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.24 GHz | vs | 3.23 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
summary | Core i5 4440 | vs | 3570 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,150 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB | |
details | Core i5 4440 | vs | 3570 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 22 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.72°C | Unknown - 67°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.29 GHz | 4.09 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.23 GHz | 4.24 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 3,691.6 | 4,357.3 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.29 GHz | 4.09 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 84W | 77W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 38.81 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 106 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 11.31 pt/W | 7.16 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 107.5W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 0 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
| Intel Core i5 4440 | Intel Core i5 3570 |
| VS | |
| $195 | $195 | |
| 4460 vs 4440 | ||
| VS | |
| $170 | $195 | |
| 8350 vs 4440 | ||
| VS | |
| $143 | $195 | |
| 8320 vs 4440 | ||
| VS | |
| $110 | $195 | |
| 6300 vs 4440 | ||
| VS | |
| $200 | $195 | |
| 4570 vs 4440 | ||
| VS | |
| $160 | $195 | |
| 7850K vs 4440 | ||
| VS | |
| $114 | $195 | |
| 4130 vs 4440 | ||
| VS | |
| $242 | $325 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| VS | |
| $161 | $225 | |
| N3530 vs 3110M | ||
| VS | |
| $340 | $325 | |
| 4790K vs 4770K | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | ||
| N2830 vs 3217U | ||
| VS | |
| $97 | $281 | |
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | ||
| 4700MQ vs 5750M | ||
| VS | |
| 800 vs 5 Octa | ||