Winner
Intel Core i5 4440
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 4440 based on its .
See full details| | Intel Core i5 4440 vs AMD FX 8320 |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Newer manufacturing process 22 nms |
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 68.25W | | Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,889 |
| | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 4 GHz |
| | Is unlocked Yes | | Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz |
by Ramish-Zafar (Jun, 2014)The enthusiast has managed to overclock the processor to a staggering 8171.53 MHz.
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Core i5 4440 7.2 FX 8320 7.5 | |
| Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Core i5 4440 9.1 FX 8320 8.0 | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Core i5 4440 7.1 FX 8320 9.9 | |
| Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Core i5 4440 7.3 FX 8320 7.7 | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
| Core i5 4440 7.9 FX 8320 7.8 | |
Intel Core i5 4440CPUBoss Winner | | |
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 32 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 101.56W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,889 | vs | 1,402 | Around 35% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 50% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Better performance per watt | 11.32 pt/W | vs | 6.68 pt/W | Around 70% better performance per watt | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 109.5 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 30.11 $/year | Around 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Marginally newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Oct, 2012 | Release date 8 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 3.3 GHz | More than 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much better PassMark (Overclocked) score | 9,317 | vs | 3,691.6 | More than 2.5x better PassMark (Overclocked) score | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.65 GHz | vs | 3.29 GHz | More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better PassMark score | 8,183 | vs | 6,483 | More than 25% better PassMark score | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 5.83 pt/$ | vs | 4.87 pt/$ | Around 20% better performance per dollar | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.82 GHz | vs | 3.23 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
summary | Core i5 4440 | vs | FX 8320 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
| Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| XOP | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| F16C | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| SSE Family | |||
| FMA | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | N/A | |
details | Core i5 4440 | vs | FX 8320 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.29 GHz | 4.65 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.23 GHz | 4.82 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 3,691.6 | 9,317 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.29 GHz | 4.65 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 84W | 125W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 30.11 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 109.5 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 11.32 pt/W | 6.68 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 101.56W | |
| Intel Core i5 4440 | AMD FX 8320 |
| VS | |
| $179 | $143 | |
| 8350 vs 8320 | ||
| VS | |
| $110 | $143 | |
| 6300 vs 8320 | ||
| VS | |
| $195 | $143 | |
| 4460 vs 8320 | ||
| VS | |
| $235 | $143 | |
| 4670K vs 8320 | ||
| VS | |
| $230 | $143 | |
| 3570K vs 8320 | ||
| VS | |
| $195 | $195 | |
| 4460 vs 4440 | ||
| VS | |
| $179 | $195 | |
| 8350 vs 4440 | ||
| VS | |
| $249 | $325 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| VS | |
| $161 | $225 | |
| N3530 vs 3110M | ||
| VS | |
| $340 | $325 | |
| 4790K vs 4770K | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | ||
| N2830 vs 3217U | ||
| VS | |
| $97 | $281 | |
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | ||
| 4700MQ vs 5750M | ||
| VS | |
| 800 vs 5 Octa | ||