CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4440 vs 6700

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
Intel Core i5 4440 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 4440  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 4440

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 4440

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4440

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4440

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,889 vs 1,535 Around 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better 3DMark11 physics score 6,390 vs 3,540 More than 80% better 3DMark11 physics score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 9,141 vs 5,681 More than 60% better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better PassMark score 6,483 vs 4,699 Around 40% better PassMark score
Better performance per dollar 4.87 pt/$ vs 4 pt/$ More than 20% better performance per dollar
Better performance per watt 11.32 pt/W vs 8.64 pt/W More than 30% better performance per watt
Slightly higher Maximum Operating Temperature 72.72 °C vs 71.3 °C Almost the same
Front view of AMD A10 6700

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 6700

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.88 GHz vs 3.29 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 68.25W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.59 GHz vs 3.23 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 73.58 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 20.24 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4440 vs A10 6700

GeekBench (32-bit)

Core i5 4440
9,141
A10 6700
5,681

GeekBench

Core i5 4440
10,066
A10 6700
5,681

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Core i5 4440
6,390
A10 6700
3,540
Core i5 4440 A10 6700 @ community.futuremark.com

Passmark (Single Core)

Core i5 4440
1,889
A10 6700
1,535

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 4440  vs
A10 6700 
Clock speed 3.1 GHz 3.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AVX 2.0
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Radeon™ HD 8670D

details

Core i5 4440  vs
A10 6700 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.72°C Unknown - 71.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.29 GHz 4.88 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.23 GHz 4.59 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.29 GHz 4.88 GHz

power consumption

TDP 84W 65W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 11.32 pt/W 8.64 pt/W
Typical power consumption 68.25W 52.81W
Intel Core i5 4440
Report a correction
AMD A10 6700
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus