Intel Core i5 4440 vs AMD A10 6700 |
Released July, 2013
Intel Core i5 4440
- 3.1 GHz
- Quad core
7.9 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 4440
 | Newer manufacturing process 22 nms | | Better 3DMark11 physics score 6,390 |
| | Better geekbench (32-bit) score 9,119 | | Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,887 |
VS
Released June, 2013
AMD A10 6700
- 3.7 GHz
- Quad core
7.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD A10 6700
| | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Higher clock speed 3.7 GHz |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.88 GHz |
by Don-Woligroski (Jun, 2013)Richland isn’t much different from Trinity, but it's more efficient thanks to specific Turbo Core optimizations that include a greater number of P-states to facilitate more granular power and performance levels.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4440 vs 6700
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 32 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better 3DMark11 physics score | 6,390 | vs | 3,540 | More than 80% better 3DMark11 physics score | |||
| Better geekbench (32-bit) score | 9,119 | vs | 5,668 | More than 60% better geekbench (32-bit) score | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,887 | vs | 1,532 | Around 25% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 6,474 | vs | 4,660 | Around 40% better PassMark score | |||
| Better performance per watt | 11.08 pt/W | vs | 8.44 pt/W | More than 30% better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.7 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.88 GHz | vs | 3.29 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 68.25W | Around 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.7 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | Around 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4440 vs A10 6700
GeekBench (32-bit)
GeekBench
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 4440 | vs | A10 6700 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | Radeon™ HD 8670D | |
details | Core i5 4440 | vs | A10 6700 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.72°C | Unknown - 71.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.29 GHz | 4.88 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.29 GHz | 4.88 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 84W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 11.08 pt/W | 8.44 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 52.81W | |
 Intel Core i5 4440  Report a correction |  AMD A10 6700 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $182 | $190 | |
| Intel Core i5 4460 vs 4440 | ||
 | VS | |
| $159 | $190 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i5 4440 | ||
 | VS | |
| $94 | $190 | |
| AMD FX 6300 vs Intel Core i5 4440 | ||
 | VS | |
| $150 | $190 | |
| AMD FX 8320 vs Intel Core i5 4440 | ||
 | VS | |
| $195 | $190 | |
| Intel Core i5 4590 vs 4440 | ||
 | VS | |
| $147 | $190 | |
| AMD A10 7850K vs Intel Core i5 4440 | ||
 | VS | |
| $205 | $190 | |
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs 4440 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $330 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $361 | $326 | |
| Intel Core i7 5820K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $229 | $326 | |
| Intel Core i5 4690K vs i7 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $85 | |
| Intel Pentium N3530 vs Core i3 3110M | ||
| | VS | |
| $326 | $330 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $393 | $281 | |
| Intel Core i7 4510U vs i5 4210U | ||
