Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4402E

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4402E

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 31.64 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W Around 7.5x better performance per watt
Much better performance per dollar 2.97 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ Around 5.8x better performance per dollar
Higher turbo clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.42 GHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,677 vs 924 More than 80% better geekbench 3 single core score
Better turbo clock speed 900 MHz vs 854 MHz More than 5% better turbo clock speed
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,544 vs 2,927 More than 20% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 400 MHz More than 70% higher GPU clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 20.31W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 6.02 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 21.9 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jul, 2013 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4402E vs Celeron J1900

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4402E
2,010,000 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 4402E  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.42 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label HD 4600 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed 900 MHz 854 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 8,192 MB

details

Core i5 4402E  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 25W 10W
Annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 31.64 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 20.31W 8.13W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core i5 4402E
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus