Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4300U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4300U

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs the Intel Core i5 4300U.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4300U vs Athlon Neo X2 L325

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 4300U  vs
Athlon Neo X2 L325 
Clock speed 1.9 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0

power consumption

TDP 15W 18W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 4.34 $/year
Performance per watt 42.92 pt/W 2.29 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 14.63W

details

Core i5 4300U  vs
Athlon Neo X2 L325 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.71 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.9 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.71 GHz 1.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label HD 4400 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 200 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz N/A
Intel Core i5 4300U
Report a correction
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus