Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4300M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4300M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 3 single core score 2,817 vs 1,511 More than 85% better geekbench 3 single core score
Slightly higher turbo clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz More than 5% higher turbo clock speed
More l3 cache 3 MB vs None Compared to all cpus, 3 MB l3 cache is just OK
Much better performance per watt 17.12 pt/W vs 11.59 pt/W Around 50% better performance per watt
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,938 vs 4,402 Around 35% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD A10 for AIOs 8700P

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 for AIOs 8700P

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 800 MHz vs 400 MHz 2x higher GPU clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 30.06W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score 14.45 fps vs 8.51 fps Around 70% better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 8.91 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 32.41 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4300M vs A10 for AIOs 8700P

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 4300M
5.23 mHash/s
A10 for AIOs 8700P
57.84 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core i5 4300M
5.99 mPixels/s
A10 for AIOs 8700P
11.66 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 4300M
128.67 fps
A10 for AIOs 8700P
111.79 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 4300M
0.88 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 4300M
8.51 fps
A10 for AIOs 8700P
14.45 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4300M
3,380,000 MB/s
A10 for AIOs 8700P
1,570 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 4300M  vs
A10 for AIOs 8700P 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 1.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.4 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-2133
DDR3

details

Core i5 4300M  vs
A10 for AIOs 8700P 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB None
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Radeon™ R6
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 800 MHz

power consumption

TDP 37W 15W
Annual home energy cost 8.91 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 32.41 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 17.12 pt/W 11.59 pt/W
Typical power consumption 30.06W 12.19W
Intel Core i5 4300M
Report a correction
AMD A10 for AIOs 8700P
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus