0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 4278U vs i3 6100 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Core i5 4278U
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 4278U
![]() | Much better performance per watt 35.39 pt/W | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 3.15 pt/$ |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 22.75W | ![]() | Better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz |
VS
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i3 6100
- 3.7 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the i3 6100
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.7 GHz | ![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
![]() | Higher GPU clock speed 350 MHz | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.25 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Core i3 6100CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better performance per watt | 35.39 pt/W | vs | 4.51 pt/W | More than 7.8x better performance per watt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better performance per dollar | 3.15 pt/$ | vs | 1.84 pt/$ | More than 70% better performance per dollar | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 22.75W | vs | 41.44W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Better turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | Around 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 6.75 $/year | vs | 12.29 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 24.53 $/year | vs | 44.68 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.7 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Higher GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | 75% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.25 GHz | vs | 2.99 GHz | More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,106 | vs | 1,724 | More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.39 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 70% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Better PassMark score | 5,478 | vs | 4,338 | More than 25% better PassMark score | |||
Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date a year later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4278U vs i3 6100
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i5 4278U
4,338
Core i3 6100
5,478
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i5 4278U
1,724
Core i3 6100
2,106
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 4278U | vs | i3 6100 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 28W | 51W | |
Annual home energy cost | 6.75 $/year | 12.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 24.53 $/year | 44.68 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 35.39 pt/W | 4.51 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 22.75W | 41.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI 2.0 | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s |
details | Core i5 4278U | vs | i3 6100 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.99 GHz | 4.25 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.6 GHz | 4.39 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.99 GHz | 4.25 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® Iris™ Graphics 5100 | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1333 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 65,536 MB |
Intel Core i5 4278U ![]() | Intel Core i3 6100 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $125 | |
Intel Pentium G4400 vs Core i3 6100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$187 | $125 | |
Intel Core i5 6400 vs i3 6100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $125 | |
AMD FX 6300 vs Intel Core i3 6100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$190 | $125 | |
Intel Core i5 4460 vs i3 6100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$117 | $125 | |
Intel Core i3 4170 vs 6100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$401 | $125 | |
Intel Core i5 6500 vs i3 6100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | $125 | |
Intel Core i5 3470 vs i3 6100 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||