CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4210Y vs Z2760

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Cinebench R11.5 (1-core), Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and 2 more

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Atom Z2760 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Atom Z2760  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Atom Z2760

Intel Atom Z2760

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4210Y

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4210Y

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has vitualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Supports more RAM 16,384 MB vs 2,048 MB Supports 8x more RAM
Better PassMark score 2,265 vs 679 More than 3.2x better PassMark score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 3,092 vs 1,048 Around 3x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 2,039 vs 945 Around 2.2x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Marginally newer Jul, 2013 vs Sep, 2012 Release date 9 months later
Front view of Intel Atom Z2760

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z2760

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 533 MHz vs 200 MHz Around 2.8x higher GPU clock speed
Much better performance per watt 64.73 pt/W vs 25.87 pt/W More than 2.5x better performance per watt
Significantly better performance per dollar 3.16 pt/$ vs 1.06 pt/$ Around 3x better performance per dollar
Lower typical power consumption 1.63W vs 9.34W 5.7x lower typical power consumption
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower annual home energy cost 0.48 $/year vs 2.77 $/year 5.7x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4210Y vs Atom Z2760

GeekBench (32-bit)

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 4210Y  vs
Atom Z2760 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is hyperthreaded Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes No
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
FMA3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 11.5W 2W
Annual home energy cost 2.77 $/year 0.48 $/year
Performance per watt 25.87 pt/W 64.73 pt/W
Typical power consumption 9.34W 1.63W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i5 4210Y  vs
Atom Z2760 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label HD 4200 Integrated
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 533 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR2-800
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 2,048 MB
Intel Core i5 4210Y
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z2760
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus