CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4200U vs 2520M among laptop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 2520M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 2520M  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 2520M

Intel Core i5 2520M

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4200U

Report a correction
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Feb, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 28.44W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 40.28 pt/W vs 20.79 pt/W Around 95% better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 2520M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2520M

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 55% higher clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 200 MHz 3.2x higher GPU clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better turbo clock speed 1,300 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 30% better turbo clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 5.64 pt/$ vs 2.15 pt/$ More than 2.5x better performance per dollar
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better geekbench 2 (64-bit) score 5,321 vs 4,720 Around 15% better geekbench 2 (64-bit) score
Better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 4,764 vs 4,228 Around 15% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.04 GHz vs 2.49 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Slightly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,982 vs 4,464 More than 10% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4200U vs 2520M

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4200U
3,015,000 MB/s
Core i5 2520M
2,080,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 4200U  vs
2520M 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.6 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 35W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 40.28 pt/W 20.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 28.44W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i5 4200U  vs
2520M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.49 GHz 3.04 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 2.5 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,713.3 1,230.7
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.49 GHz 3.04 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4400 HD Graphics 3000
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 1,300 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3L-1333
LPDDR3-1333
DDR3
LPDDR3-1600
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 16,384 MB
Intel Core i5 4200U
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 2520M
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus