CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4200U vs 440 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 4200U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 4200U  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4200U

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 2,450 vs 980 2.5x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 4,228 vs 867 Around 5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much better performance per watt 38.06 pt/W vs 1.7 pt/W More than 22.2x better performance per watt
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much better performance per dollar 2.03 pt/$ vs 1.24 pt/$ Around 65% better performance per dollar
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,464 vs 758 Around 6x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 60.4 °C More than 65% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,380 vs 658 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 7 years later
Lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 28.44W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron M 440

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 440

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz vs 2.49 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.98 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4200U vs Celeron M 440

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4200U
3,015,000 MB/s
Celeron M 440
74,050 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 4200U  vs
Celeron M 440 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 15W 35W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 38.06 pt/W 1.7 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 28.44W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i5 4200U  vs
Celeron M 440 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 60.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.49 GHz 3.57 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 3.98 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,713.3 1,585.7
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.49 GHz 3.57 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4400 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 200 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Core i5 4200U
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 440
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus