Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4200U

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD Turion II Neo K665

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion II Neo K665

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Turion II Neo K665 vs the Intel Core i5 4200U.

Features Key features of the Core i5 4200U  vs Turion II Neo K665 

clock speed

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

overclocked clock speed (water)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 4200U  vs
Turion II Neo K665 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 15W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 3.61 $/year
Typical power consumption 12.19W 12.19W

details

Core i5 4200U  vs
Turion II Neo K665 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.49 GHz 1.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.49 GHz 1.7 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4400 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 200 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A
Intel Core i5 4200U
Report a correction
AMD Turion II Neo K665
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus