CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4200U vs 350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 4200U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 4200U  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4200U

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 2,450 vs 24 More than 102x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much higher turbo clock speed 2.6 GHz vs None Compared to all cpus, 2.6 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 4,228 vs 1,032 More than 4x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much better performance per watt 38.06 pt/W vs 1.5 pt/W Around 25.5x better performance per watt
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 11.53 mHash/s vs 7.51 mHash/s Around 55% better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,464 vs 1,096 More than 4x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,380 vs 420 More than 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 30.2W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 12 $/year 3.3x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 28.21 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 492 MHz vs 200 MHz Around 2.5x higher GPU clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 2.49 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4200U vs E 350

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 4200U
11.53 mHash/s
E 350
7.51 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 4200U
1.18 fps
E 350
0.1 fps

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

E 350
1,106

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

E 350
590

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

E 350
1,175

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
1,096

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
620

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 4200U
3,015,000 MB/s
E 350
51,600 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 4200U  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.6 GHz None
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 18W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 28.21 $/year
Performance per watt 38.06 pt/W 1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 30.2W

details

Core i5 4200U  vs
E 350 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.49 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.49 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4400 Radeon™ HD 6310
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 492 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1066
DDR3L-1333
LPDDR3-1333
LPDDR3-1600
Intel Core i5 4200U
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus