Winner
Intel Core i5 4200M
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 4200M based on its .
See full details Intel Core i5 4200M vs 3230M |
Released October, 2013
Intel Core i5 4200M
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
7.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 4200M
 | More l2 cache 1 MB | | Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
| | Slightly better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz | | Marginally newer Oct, 2013 |
by Joel-Hruska (Jun, 2014)Dubbed the Core M, this chip could be a fundamental game changer for Santa Clara, for one simple reason — it will allow the company to finally build big-core x86 devices that fit into form factors thin enough to compete with current Android, Apple, and Windows tablets based on its own Bay Trail.
VS
Released January, 2013
Intel Core i5 3230M
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
7.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 3230M
| | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz | | Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 105 °C |
by Joel-Hruska (Jun, 2014)We’re assuming that the 32-hours battery claim involves some degree of fudging, since battery technology hasn’t improved that much and there’s only so much space behind the tablet display for lithium-ion storage — but even a 10-12 hour battery life would be impressive for a big-core x86 device.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4200M vs 3230M
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| 3DMark06 (CPU) and Passmark | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Power Consumption | |
How much power does the processor require? | |
| TDP | |
Features | |
How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product? | |
| Features and specifications that differ between products | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i5 4200MCPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Slightly better turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | vs | 1,100 MHz | Around 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Marginally newer | Oct, 2013 | vs | Jan, 2013 | Release date 8 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | Around 65% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Higher Maximum Operating Temperature | 105 °C | vs | 100 °C | 5% higher Maximum Operating Temperature | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4200M vs 3230M
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 4200M | vs | 3230M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 37W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.91 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 14.64 pt/W | 15.79 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 30.06W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI 2.0 | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Core i5 4200M | vs | 3230M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 22 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | 1,100 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,000 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Core i5 4200M  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 3230M Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $281 | |
| 4200M vs 4200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $393 | |
| 4200M vs 4500U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $281 | |
| 4200M vs 4210U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $378 | |
| 4200M vs 4700MQ | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $281 | |
| 3230M vs 4200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $161 | |
| 3230M vs N3520 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| 3230M vs 5550M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $313 | $329 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $313 | $340 | |
| 4770K vs 4790K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $313 | $195 | |
| 4770K vs 4790 | ||
 | VS | |
| $378 | ||
| 5750M vs 4700MQ | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | $235 | |
| 8350 vs 4670K | ||
| | VS | |
| $281 | $393 | |
| 4200U vs 4500U | ||
| | VS | |
| $281 | $225 | |
| 4200U vs 4200M | ||
