Winner
Intel Core i5 4200M
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 4200M based on its .
See full details Intel Core i5 4200M vs i3 4000M |
Released October, 2013
Intel Core i5 4200M
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
6.8 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (Sep, 2014)So some of the key aspects of the Broadwell microarchitecture would be to be suitable for fanless devices, deliver on core performance improvements and feature enhanced graphics, media, display capabilities.
VS
Released October, 2013
Intel Core i3 4000M
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
7 Out of 10
by Ian-Cutress (Sep, 2014)The first batch of 4.5W Core M processors aim at either the 11.6-inch, 8mm thick fanless tablet design as indicated in the graph above, or similarly a 10.1-inch 10mm thick tablet will also be suitable.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4200M vs 4000M among laptop CPUs (over 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core i5 4200M vs the Core i3 4000M. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core i3 4000M vs the Core i5 4200M. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4200M vs i3 4000M
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 4200M | vs | i3 4000M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 37W | 37W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.91 $/year | 8.91 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 16.78 pt/W | 4.45 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 30.06W | 30.06W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI 2.0 | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Core i5 4200M | vs | i3 4000M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.02 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.02 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | 400 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | 1,100 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,000 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Core i5 4200M  Report a correction |  Intel Core i3 4000M Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $281 | |
| 4200M vs 4200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $225 | |
| 4200M vs 3230M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $386 | |
| 4200M vs 4700MQ | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $281 | |
| 4200M vs 4210U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $393 | |
| 4200M vs 4500U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| 4200M vs 5750M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $281 | |
| 4200M vs 5200U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
