CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4200M vs 5750M


Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?



How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Intel Core i5 4200M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 4200M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Intel Core i5 4200M

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 4200M

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4200M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4200M

Report a correction
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 720 MHz Around 60% better turbo clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,670 vs 1,230 More than 35% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better 3DMark11 physics score 3,260 vs 2,510 Around 30% better 3DMark11 physics score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 5,342 vs 4,121 Around 30% better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 3,882.5 vs 3,238 Around 20% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Mar, 2013 Release date 6 months later
Front view of AMD A10 5750M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5750M

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Around 15% higher turbo clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Higher GPU clock speed 533 MHz vs 400 MHz Around 35% higher GPU clock speed
Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 105 °C vs 100 °C 5% higher Maximum Operating Temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4200M vs A10 5750M

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Core i5 4200M A10 5750M @ community.futuremark.com


Core i5 4200M A10 5750M @ cpubenchmark.net

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Core i5 4200M  vs
A10 5750M 
Clock speed 2.5 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.1 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded Yes No


Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
Supplemental SSE3
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 37W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.91 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 13.85 pt/W 12.06 pt/W
Typical power consumption 30.06W 28.44W


Core i5 4200M  vs
A10 5750M 
Architecture x86-64 ARM
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 105°C


Overclocked clock speed 3.03 GHz 3.21 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.03 GHz 3.21 GHz

integrated graphics

Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Radeon™ HD 8650G
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 533 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz 720 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
Intel Core i5 4200M
Report a correction
AMD A10 5750M
Report a correction


Showing 4 comments.
a10-5750m is low end shit which bottlenecks the gpu
You'll likely pay significantly more for the Intel and the real world performance is practically the same, maybe even better on the AMD for gaming due to the Radeon. I'd stick with AMD for value for price.
A10-5750M with Radeon HD 8650G the bast Choice
intel costs 100 euros more.... and overall the performance is quite the same! amd bang for the buck! (i'am not a fanboy!)
comments powered by Disqus