CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4200M vs 5750M among laptop CPUs (over 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 4200M

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 4200M

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 4200M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4200M

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 720 MHz Around 60% better turbo clock speed
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 2,669 vs 1,699 More than 55% better geekbench 3 single core score
Better geekbench 2 (64-bit) score 6,048 vs 4,225 Around 45% better geekbench 2 (64-bit) score
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 3,882.5 vs 3,238 Around 20% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Slightly better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score 0.89 fps vs 0.62 fps Around 45% better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Mar, 2013 Release date 6 months later
Front view of AMD A10 5750M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5750M

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Around 15% higher turbo clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better fire strike score 773 vs 659 More than 15% better fire strike score
Higher GPU clock speed 533 MHz vs 400 MHz Around 35% higher GPU clock speed
Better PCMark 8 home 3.0 accelerated score 2,734 vs 2,521 Around 10% better PCMark 8 home 3.0 accelerated score
Higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 100 °C 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.21 GHz vs 3.02 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 4200M vs A10 5750M

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 4200M
14.56 mHash/s
A10 5750M
58.66 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 4200M
0.89 fps
A10 5750M
0.62 fps

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

A10 5750M
2,734

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

A10 5750M
2,732

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

A10 5750M
3,700

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 5750M
4,437

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 5750M
1,699

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 5750M
4,121

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 4200M  vs
A10 5750M 
Clock speed 2.5 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.1 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 37W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.91 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 17.88 pt/W 13.8 pt/W
Typical power consumption 30.06W 28.44W

details

Core i5 4200M  vs
A10 5750M 
Architecture x86-64 ARM
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 105°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.02 GHz 3.21 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.02 GHz 3.21 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Radeon™ HD 8650G
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 533 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz 720 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3L-1600
DDR3L-1333
Intel Core i5 4200M
Report a correction
AMD A10 5750M
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 4 comments.
a10-5750m is low end shit which bottlenecks the gpu
You'll likely pay significantly more for the Intel and the real world performance is practically the same, maybe even better on the AMD for gaming due to the Radeon. I'd stick with AMD for value for price.
A10-5750M with Radeon HD 8650G the bast Choice
intel costs 100 euros more.... and overall the performance is quite the same! amd bang for the buck! (i'am not a fanboy!)
comments powered by Disqus