0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 3570T vs Celeron Mendocino |
Released April, 2012
Intel Core i5 3570T
- 2.3 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 3570T
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | More cores 4 |
![]() | More threads 4 | ![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
VS
Released August, 1998
Intel Celeron Mendocino
- 0.4 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Celeron Mendocino
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 19.26W | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 5.71 $/year |
![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 20.76 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 250 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 19.26W | vs | 90.75W | 4.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 5.71 $/year | vs | 34.69 $/year | 6.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 20.76 $/year | vs | 86.72 $/year | 4.2x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Core i5 3570T vs Celeron Mendocino
clock speed
Core i5 3570T
2.3 GHz
Celeron Mendocino
0.4 GHz
L2 cache
Core i5 3570T
1 MB
Celeron Mendocino
0.13 MB
TDP
Core i5 3570T
45W
Celeron Mendocino
23.7W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 3570T | vs | Celeron Mendocino |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 0.4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
370 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Core i5 3570T | vs | Celeron Mendocino |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
Threads | 4 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.13 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.13 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 250 nm | |
Transistor count | 1,400,000,000 | 19,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 23 | 6 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 69.8°C | Unknown - 85°C | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 45W | 23.7W | |
Annual home energy cost | 34.69 $/year | 5.71 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 86.72 $/year | 20.76 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 90.75W | 19.26W |
Intel Core i5 3570T ![]() | Intel Celeron Mendocino ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | ||
1800 vs 3570T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | $205 | |
3570K vs 3570T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $205 | |
4770K vs 3570T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$168 | $205 | |
3570 vs 3570T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | $205 | |
3470T vs 3570T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $205 | |
4590 vs 3570T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$330 | $205 | |
3770T vs 3570T | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||