Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 3570K

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 3570K

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 3570K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3570K

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 3.09 pt/$ vs 1.51 pt/$ More than 2x better performance per dollar
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 85% higher GPU clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.59 GHz vs 2.7 GHz More than 70% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 15% better turbo clock speed
Slightly more l3 cache 6 MB vs 4 MB 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,012 vs 1,559 Around 30% better PassMark (Single core) score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better PassMark score 7,152 vs 4,347 Around 65% better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.71 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core i3 6100TE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 6100TE

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 107.5W 3.8x lower typical power consumption
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 38.81 $/year 4.6x lower annual home energy cost
Newer Oct, 2015 vs Apr, 2012 Release date over 3 years later
More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 106 $/year 3.5x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 3570K vs i3 6100TE

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 3570K  vs
i3 6100TE 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 77W 35W
Annual home energy cost 38.81 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 106 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 4.69 pt/W 5.04 pt/W
Typical power consumption 107.5W 28.44W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 8,000 MT/s

details

Core i5 3570K  vs
i3 6100TE 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L3 cache 6 MB 4 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.59 GHz 2.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.71 GHz 2.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.59 GHz 2.7 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Intel® HD Graphics 530
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 65,536 MB
Intel Core i5 3570K
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 6100TE
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus