Winner
Intel Core i5 3550S
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3550S based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details | Intel Core i5 3550S vs Celeron J1900 |
![]() | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.7 GHz | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 3.75 pt/$ | ![]() | Much better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz |
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W |
![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year | ![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
7.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
Intel Core i5 3550SCPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 3.7 GHz | vs | 2.42 GHz | Around 55% higher turbo clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | 50% higher clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 3.75 pt/$ | vs | 0.52 pt/$ | Around 7.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Much better turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | vs | 854 MHz | Around 35% better turbo clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,964 | vs | 534 | Around 3.8x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Significantly better PassMark score | 6,774 | vs | 1,863 | Around 3.8x better PassMark score | |||
Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score | 3.65 mHash/s | vs | 1.78 mHash/s | More than 2x better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.68 GHz | vs | 2.42 GHz | More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Better performance per watt | 6.28 pt/W | vs | 4.27 pt/W | More than 45% better performance per watt | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4 GHz | vs | 2.42 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 106.75W | 13.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 38.63 $/year | 16x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 105.12 $/year | 12x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Slightly higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 650 MHz | More than 5% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Newer | Oct, 2013 | vs | Apr, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later |
summary | Core i5 3550S | vs | Celeron J1900 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 688 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | 854 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 8,192 MB |
details | Core i5 3550S | vs | Celeron J1900 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.68 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.68 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 10W | |
Annual home energy cost | 38.63 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 105.12 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 6.28 pt/W | 4.27 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 106.75W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI 2.0 | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Core i5 3550S ![]() | Intel Celeron J1900 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $125 | |
J1900 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $107 | |
J1900 vs N3150 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $72 | |
J1900 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $75 | |
J1900 vs 1037U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $94 | |
J1900 vs J2900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
J1900 vs J3455 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
J1900 vs J3160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||