CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3470S vs 4455M

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Value

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Value

Winner
Intel Core i5 3470S 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3470S  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 3470S

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 3470S

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 3470S

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3470S

Report a correction
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 40% higher turbo clock speed
Higher clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l3 cache 6 MB vs 1 MB 6x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,848 vs 778 Around 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better geekbench (32-bit) score 9,042 vs 1,527 Around 6x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Significantly better PassMark score 6,278 vs 1,302 More than 4.8x better PassMark score
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 3x more l3 cache per core
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better performance per watt 15.95 pt/W vs 11.78 pt/W More than 35% better performance per watt
Front view of AMD A6 4455M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 4455M

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Slightly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 52.81W 3.8x lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum Operating Temperature 100 °C vs 69.1 °C Around 45% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 3.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 3.8x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 3470S vs A6 4455M

GeekBench (32-bit)

A6 4455M
1,527

GeekBench

A6 4455M
2,838

Passmark

A6 4455M
1,302
Core i5 3470S A6 4455M @ cpubenchmark.net

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 3470S  vs
A6 4455M 
Clock speed 2.9 GHz 2.1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 17W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 14.89 $/year
Performance per watt 15.95 pt/W 11.78 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 13.81W

details

Core i5 3470S  vs
A6 4455M 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 69.1°C Unknown - 100°C

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Radeon™ HD 7500G
Latest DirectX 11.0 11.0
Intel Core i5 3470S
Report a correction
AMD A6 4455M
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus