Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A10 6700 |
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i5 3470
- 3.2 GHz
- Quad core
6.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 3470
 | Much more l3 cache 6 MB | | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
| | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.09 GHz |
VS
Released June, 2013
AMD A10 6700
- 3.7 GHz
- Quad core
6.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD A10 6700
| | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Significantly higher clock speed 3.7 GHz |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.8 GHz |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3470 vs 6700 among desktop CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache | 6 MB | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 6 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.09 GHz | vs | 3.7 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.7 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.8 GHz | vs | 3.67 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 86.05W | Around 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 71.3 °C | vs | 67.4 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 31.22 $/year | Around 50% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 84.62 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Newer | Jun, 2013 | vs | Jun, 2012 | Release date a year later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 3470 vs A10 6700
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 3470 | vs | A10 6700 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| ABM | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 77W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 31.22 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 84.62 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 4.41 pt/W | 7.8 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 86.05W | 52.81W | |
details | Core i5 3470 | vs | A10 6700 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | None | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 67.4°C | Unknown - 71.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.67 GHz | 4.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.09 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.67 GHz | 4.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | Radeon™ HD 8670D | |
| Latest DirectX | 11.0 | 11.0 | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 844 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
 Intel Core i5 3470  Report a correction |  AMD A10 6700 Report a correction |
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 23 desktops with the Intel Core i5 3470, starting from $215
- 1 desktop with the AMD A10 6700, starting from $430
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $168 | $180 | |
| 3570 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $205 | $180 | |
| 2400 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $240 | $180 | |
| 3770 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $305 | $180 | |
| 2600 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $300 | $180 | |
| 2500 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $160 | $180 | |
| 4570 vs 3470 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
| | VS | |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
