CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3427U vs Z2760


Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), PassMark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Cinebench R11.5 (1-core), Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and 2 more

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?



How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 3427U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3427U

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Supports more RAM 32,768 MB vs 2,048 MB Supports 16x more RAM
Significantly better 3DMark06 CPU score 3,179.5 vs 945 More than 3.2x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Better PassMark score 3,574 vs 679 More than 5.2x better PassMark score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 4,406 vs 1,041 Around 4.2x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.47 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom Z2760

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z2760

Report a correction
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 533 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 50% higher GPU clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 1.63W vs 13.81W 8.5x lower typical power consumption
Significantly better performance per watt 61.7 pt/W vs 26.04 pt/W More than 2.2x better performance per watt
Better performance per dollar 3.01 pt/$ vs 1.97 pt/$ Around 55% better performance per dollar
Lower annual home energy cost 0.48 $/year vs 4.1 $/year 8.5x lower annual home energy cost
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Jun, 2012 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 3427U vs Atom Z2760

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs


3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy PassMark

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Core i5 3427U  vs
Atom Z2760 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core


Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 2W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 0.48 $/year
Performance per watt 26.04 pt/W 61.7 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 1.63W


Architecture DMI 2.0 FSB
Number of links 1 1


Core i5 3427U  vs
Atom Z2760 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1


Overclocked clock speed 2.47 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.47 GHz 1.5 GHz

integrated graphics

Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Integrated
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 533 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 2,048 MB
Intel Core i5 3427U
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z2760
Report a correction


Showing 1 comment.
Comparação muito boa.
comments powered by Disqus