Winner
Intel Core i5 3210M
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3210M based on its performance.
See full details Intel Core i5 3337U vs 3210M |
Released January, 2013
Intel Core i5 3337U
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
6.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 3337U
 | Significantly lower typical power consumption 13.81W | | Better performance per watt 23.5 pt/W |
| | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year | | Marginally newer Jan, 2013 |
VS
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i5 3210M
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 3210M
| | Significantly higher clock speed 2.5 GHz | | Higher turbo clock speed 3.1 GHz |
| | More l2 cache 1 MB | | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz |
by Joel-Hruska (Jun, 2014)Dubbed the Core M, this chip could be a fundamental game changer for Santa Clara, for one simple reason — it will allow the company to finally build big-core x86 devices that fit into form factors thin enough to compete with current Android, Apple, and Windows tablets based on its own Bay Trail.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3337U vs 3210M
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| 3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Power Consumption | |
How much power does the processor require? | |
| TDP | |
Features | |
How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product? | |
| Features and specifications that differ between products | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Core i5 3210MCPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 13.81W | vs | 28.44W | 2.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better performance per watt | 23.5 pt/W | vs | 14.41 pt/W | Around 65% better performance per watt | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | 2.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Marginally newer | Jan, 2013 | vs | Jun, 2012 | Release date 7 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | More than 85% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Significantly more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better 3DMark11 physics score | 3,130 | vs | 1,970 | Around 60% better 3DMark11 physics score | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,524 | vs | 1,262 | More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 2.24 pt/$ | vs | 1.78 pt/$ | More than 25% better performance per dollar | |||
| Slightly better PassMark score | 3,823 | vs | 3,161 | More than 20% better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 3337U vs 3210M
GeekBench (32-bit)
GeekBench (64-bit)
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 3337U | vs | 3210M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
| rPGA 988B | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | HD 4000 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,100 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
details | Core i5 3337U | vs | 3210M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 22 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 18 | 25 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.86 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.7 GHz | 2.86 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 17W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 23.5 pt/W | 14.41 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
 Intel Core i5 3337U  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 3210M Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $281 | |
| Intel Core i5 3337U vs 4200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $225 | |
| Intel Core i5 3337U vs 3230M | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $50 | |
| Intel Core i5 3210M vs AMD A10 4600M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $31 | |
| Intel Core i5 3210M vs AMD A8 4500M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3210M vs AMD A10 5750M | ||
| | VS | |
| $225 | $281 | |
| Intel Core i5 3210M vs 4200U | ||
| | VS | |
| $225 | $225 | |
| Intel Core i5 3210M vs 3230M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $309 | $329 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $309 | $195 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs 4790 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $309 | $340 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | $235 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i5 4670K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $378 | ||
| AMD A10 5750M vs Intel Core i7 4700MQ | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | $393 | |
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs i7 4500U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | $225 | |
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs 4200M | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
