Intel Core i5 3337U vs 3210M |
Released January, 2013
Intel Core i5 3337U
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
6.8 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 3337U
 | Significantly lower typical power consumption 13.81W | | Better performance per watt 23.93 pt/W |
| | Better geekbench (64-bit) score 6,811 | | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year |
VS
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i5 3210M
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 3210M
| | Significantly higher clock speed 2.5 GHz | | Higher turbo clock speed 3.1 GHz |
| | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz | | Better 3DMark11 physics score 3,130 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3337U vs 3210M
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| 3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Power Consumption | |
How much power does the processor require? | |
| TDP | |
Features | |
How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product? | |
| Features and specifications that differ between products | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 13.81W | vs | 28.44W | 2.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better performance per watt | 23.93 pt/W | vs | 14.68 pt/W | Around 65% better performance per watt | |||
| Better geekbench (64-bit) score | 6,811 | vs | 5,229 | More than 30% better geekbench (64-bit) score | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | 2.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Marginally newer | Jan, 2013 | vs | Jun, 2012 | Release date 7 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | More than 85% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Better 3DMark11 physics score | 3,130 | vs | 1,970 | Around 60% better 3DMark11 physics score | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,524 | vs | 1,262 | More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 2.28 pt/$ | vs | 1.81 pt/$ | More than 25% better performance per dollar | |||
| Slightly better PassMark score | 3,823 | vs | 3,161 | More than 20% better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 3337U vs 3210M
GeekBench (32-bit)
GeekBench (64-bit)
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 3337U | vs | 3210M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
| rPGA 988B | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | HD 4000 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,100 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
details | Core i5 3337U | vs | 3210M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 22 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 18 | 25 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.7 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 17W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 23.93 pt/W | 14.68 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
 Intel Core i5 3337U  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 3210M Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $281 | |
| Intel Core i5 3337U vs 4200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $225 | |
| Intel Core i5 3337U vs 3230M | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3210M vs AMD A10 4600M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3210M vs AMD A8 4500M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3210M vs AMD A10 5750M | ||
| | VS | |
| $225 | $281 | |
| Intel Core i5 3210M vs 4200U | ||
| | VS | |
| $225 | $225 | |
| Intel Core i5 3210M vs 3230M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $340 | ||
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $240 | $340 | |
| Intel Core i5 4670K vs i7 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $340 | $332 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs I7 4820k | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $240 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i5 4670K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | $393 | |
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs i7 4500U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $378 | $378 | |
| Intel Core i7 4700HQ vs 4700MQ | ||
| | VS | |
| $225 | $281 | |
| Intel Core i5 3230M vs 4200U | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
