CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3337U vs N2815


Benchmark performance using all cores

PassMark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?



How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 3337U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3337U

Report a correction
Higher turbo clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 25% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 756 MHz More than 45% better turbo clock speed
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,262 vs 462 Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 3,161 vs 882 More than 3.5x better PassMark score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 4,136 vs 1,308 Around 3.2x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.7 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per dollar 1.66 pt/$ vs 1 pt/$ More than 65% better performance per dollar
Front view of Intel Celeron N2815

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2815

Report a correction
Much higher GPU clock speed 844 MHz vs 350 MHz Around 2.5x higher GPU clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Lower typical power consumption 6.09W vs 13.81W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Nov, 2013 vs Jan, 2013 Release date 9 months later
Lower annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year vs 4.1 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 3337U vs Celeron N2815

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs


PassMark Data courtesy PassMark

PassMark (Single Core) Data courtesy PassMark

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Core i5 3337U  vs
Celeron N2815 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.86 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 1023
BGA 1170
Is unlocked No No


Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 7.5W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 1.81 $/year
Performance per watt 21.96 pt/W 17.6 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 6.09W


Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1


Core i5 3337U  vs
Celeron N2815 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1


Overclocked clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.7 GHz 2.13 GHz

integrated graphics

Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 844 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz 756 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Intel Core i5 3337U
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N2815
Report a correction

Read more


comments powered by Disqus