CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3337U vs N2815

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Core i5 3337U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3337U  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 3337U

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 3337U

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 3337U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3337U

Report a correction
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Higher turbo clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 25% higher turbo clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,262 vs 463 Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better PassMark score 3,161 vs 929 Around 3.5x better PassMark score
Better performance per dollar 1.78 pt/$ vs 1.14 pt/$ More than 55% better performance per dollar
Front view of Intel Celeron N2815

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2815

Report a correction
Much higher GPU clock speed 844 MHz vs 350 MHz Around 2.5x higher GPU clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Lower typical power consumption 6.09W vs 13.81W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Marginally newer Nov, 2013 vs Jan, 2013 Release date 9 months later
Lower annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year vs 4.1 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 3337U vs Celeron N2815

Passmark

Core i5 3337U Celeron N2815 @ cpubenchmark.net

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 3337U  vs
Celeron N2815 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.86 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 1023
BGA 1170
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
EM64T
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 17W 7.5W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 1.81 $/year
Performance per watt 23.52 pt/W 20.04 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 6.09W

details

Core i5 3337U  vs
Celeron N2815 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 22 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 HD (Bray Trail)
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 844 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1600
DDR3L-1333
DDR3L-1066
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Intel Core i5 3337U
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N2815
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus