CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3337U vs 5200


Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?



How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Intel Core i5 3337U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3337U  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Intel Core i5 3337U

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 3337U

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 3337U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3337U

Report a correction
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 28 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Significantly higher Maximum Operating Temperature 105 °C vs 90 °C More than 15% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,262 vs 781 More than 60% better PassMark (Single core) score
Lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 20.31W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark score 3,161 vs 2,436 Around 30% better PassMark score
Better performance per watt 22.52 pt/W vs 13.72 pt/W Around 65% better performance per watt
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 4,134 vs 3,243 More than 25% better geekbench (32-bit) score
Slightly better 3DMark06 CPU score 3,145 vs 2,659.5 Around 20% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 6.02 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD A6 5200

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 5200

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 3337U vs A6 5200

GeekBench (32-bit)

A6 5200


A6 5200

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

A6 5200


A6 5200
Core i5 3337U A6 5200 @ cpubenchmark.net

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Core i5 3337U  vs
A6 5200 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded Yes No


Has a NX bit Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supplemental SSE3


Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Radeon™ HD 8400


Core i5 3337U  vs
A6 5200 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 28 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 90°C


Overclocked clock speed 2.7 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.7 GHz 2 GHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 25W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 6.02 $/year
Performance per watt 22.52 pt/W 13.72 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 20.31W
Intel Core i5 3337U
Report a correction
AMD A6 5200
Report a correction


comments powered by Disqus