CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3330 vs 77 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 3330 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3330  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 3330

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 3330

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 3330

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3330

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,697 vs 662 More than 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better PassMark score 5,905 vs 1,230 More than 4.8x better PassMark score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better performance per watt 4.85 pt/W vs 1.92 pt/W More than 2.5x better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of AMD Turion X2 77

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion X2 77

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 72.31W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 67.4 °C Around 50% higher Maximum operating temperature
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 21.44 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 77.96 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 3330 vs Turion X2 77

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 3330
2,170,000 MB/s
Turion X2 77
59,800 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 3330  vs
Turion X2 77 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1155
S1
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core i5 3330  vs
Turion X2 77 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 67.4°C Unknown - 100°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 77W 35W
Annual home energy cost 21.44 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 77.96 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 4.85 pt/W 1.92 pt/W
Typical power consumption 72.31W 28.44W
Intel Core i5 3330
Report a correction
AMD Turion X2 77
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus