Winner
Intel Core i5 3317U
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3317U based on its performance.
See full details Intel Core i5 3317U vs i3 3217U |
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i5 3317U
- 1.7 GHz
- Dual core
6.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 3317U
 | Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,225 | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.43 GHz |
| | Better 3DMark06 CPU score 2,984.5 | | Better PassMark score 3,109 |
VS
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i3 3217U
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
6.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the i3 3217U
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz |
The Intel Core i5 3317U and the Intel Core i3 3217U are a couple of Ultra-low-voltage processors that were released at the same time in the second quarter for 2010. The two feature a similar, almost identical, set of features and parameters.
Both the i5 and the i3 are dual-core processors without hyperthreading and 3MB of L3 cache. The only difference is that the i5 clocks at 1.7GHz per core, while the i3 clocks at 1.8GHz per core, which is not that big of a difference in all honesty. Where the i5 outperforms the i3, however, is in its higher performance-per-dollar rating and the significantly higher overclocked clock speed. The i5 can be overclocked to 2.38GHz, while the i3 budges by a single MHz, up to 1.81GHz.
So the verdict is pretty clear: despite being almost unnoticeably slower, the i5 outperforms the i3 when it comes to efficiency and overclock speed.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3317U vs 3217U
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| 3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Power Consumption | |
How much power does the processor require? | |
| TDP | |
Features | |
How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product? | |
| Features and specifications that differ between products | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i5 3317UCPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,225 | vs | 879 | Around 40% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.43 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better 3DMark06 CPU score | 2,984.5 | vs | 2,229 | Around 35% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 3,109 | vs | 2,293 | More than 35% better PassMark score | |||
| Slightly better geekbench (64-bit) score | 4,475 | vs | 3,368 | Around 35% better geekbench (64-bit) score | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 1.84 pt/$ | vs | 1.55 pt/$ | Around 20% better performance per dollar | |||
| |||||||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 3317U vs i3 3217U
GeekBench (32-bit)
GeekBench (64-bit)
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 3317U | vs | i3 3217U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
| Latest DirectX | 11.0 | 11.0 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3RS-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| DDR3RS-1600 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
details | Core i5 3317U | vs | i3 3217U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 22 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 17 | 18 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.43 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.43 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 17W | 17W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 24.4 pt/W | 20.46 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI 2.0 | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Data rate | 2,560 MB/s | 2,560 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
 Intel Core i5 3317U  Report a correction |  Intel Core i3 3217U Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $225 | |
| 3110M vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $225 | |
| 1007U vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| 5050 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| N2830 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $132 | $225 | |
| N2820 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 2117U vs 3217U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $329 | $313 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $340 | $313 | |
| 4790K vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $195 | $313 | |
| 4790 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $378 | ||
| 4700MQ vs 5750M | ||
 | VS |  |
| $235 | $178 | |
| 4670K vs 8350 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $393 | $281 | |
| 4500U vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $281 | |
| 4200M vs 4200U | ||
