0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 3230M vs AMD Opteron 254 |
Released January, 2013
Intel Core i5 3230M
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 3230M
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W |
![]() | Much better performance per watt 12.42 pt/W | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C |
VS
Released August, 2005
AMD Opteron 254
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 254
![]() | More l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 75.24W | 2.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better performance per watt | 12.42 pt/W | vs | 0.69 pt/W | Around 18x better performance per watt | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 105 °C | vs | 67 °C | More than 55% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Newer | Jan, 2013 | vs | Aug, 2005 | Release date over 7 years later | |||
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,583 | vs | 889 | Around 80% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better PassMark score | 3,989 | vs | 693 | More than 5.8x better PassMark score | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 22.31 $/year | 2.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 81.12 $/year | 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 3230M vs Opteron 254
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i5 3230M
3,989
Opteron 254
693
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i5 3230M
1,583
Opteron 254
889
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 3230M | vs | Opteron 254 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
rPGA 988B | |||
940 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Core i5 3230M | vs | Opteron 254 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 26 | 14 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | 0 - 67°C | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 92.6W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 22.31 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 81.12 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 12.42 pt/W | 0.69 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 75.24W |
Intel Core i5 3230M ![]() | AMD Opteron 254 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $225 | |
Intel Core i5 4200U vs 3230M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $225 | |
Intel Core i5 3337U vs 3230M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
AMD A8 4500M vs Intel Core i5 3230M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | $225 | |
Intel Core i5 3210M vs 3230M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
AMD A8 5550M vs Intel Core i5 3230M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $225 | |
Intel Core i5 4200M vs 3230M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $225 | |
Intel Pentium N3520 vs Core i5 3230M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||