0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 3210M vs Celeron M 360 |
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i5 3210M
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 3210M
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 360 vs the Core i5 3210M. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 3210M vs Celeron M 360
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i5 3210M
3,823
Celeron M 360
327
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i5 3210M
1,524
Celeron M 360
424
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 3210M | vs | Celeron M 360 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
rPGA 988B | |||
479 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 21W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 5.06 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 12.39 pt/W | 1.45 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 17.06W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI 2.0 | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Core i5 3210M | vs | Celeron M 360 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
Threads | 4 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 90 nm | |
Transistor count | 1,400,000,000 | 144,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 25 | 14 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 4.83 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,623.4 | 732.6 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.9 GHz | 4.83 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | HD 4000 | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | 11.0 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Supports ECC | No | No |
Intel Core i5 3210M ![]() | Intel Celeron M 360 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | ||
3210M vs 4600M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | ||
3210M vs 4500M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | $225 | |
3210M vs 3230M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | ||
3210M vs 4400M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | $134 | |
3210M vs 2020M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | $225 | |
3210M vs 3337U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | $80 | |
3210M vs 3110M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||